Euthanasia Is Not An Ethical Option Nursingâ€Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Euthanasia Is Not An Ethical Option Nursing? Answer: Introducation Euthanasia is the medical practice of ending the individuals life for relieving him of suffering and pain, under clinical conditions. Whether euthanasia is to be considered as an ethical option has been the topic of debate in contemporary research (Boudreau, 2011). This paper aims to put forward a critical analysis of the viewpoint that euthanasia is not an ethical option. The supporting evidence for the statement are based on the theories of healthcare ethics, cultural, spiritual and social factors, and professional codes of ethics and conduct. As highlighted by Murphy (2016) euthanasia can be considered for patients who are terminally ill and are in a position to take their own decisions. Voluntary euthanasia is the civilised, moral and humane outcome for countries who strive to achieve care delivery consistent with the objective of providing care with dignity for patients who want it. Arguments supporting euthanasia are based on the rights of individuals. All individuals have the right to take their own decisions regarding their life. After the Euthanasia Laws Act 1997, Australians have argued the same. If a person is denied the right to end his life, then it implies that he is not permitted to exercise his right. It is solely a personal decision to handle issues of own death and life. It is perhaps an acceptable and latent view that elderly people should be given the freedom to decide about their life as long as no harm is done to others. Religious and spiritual implications of euthanasia have come into focus. Ethical values and moral beliefs support euthanasia, and active participation of churches in such practices have upheld the practice to the considerable extent. The multicultural society of Australia have different viewpoints about euthanasia, and as per the popular option, indigenous and minority groups strongly support euthanasia (Math Chaturvedi, 2012). Economic arguments have the focus on reduction of health budget as a result of a decrease in patient number from euthanasia (Sharp, 2017). Refutation of the arguments against euthanasia comment that the system is not an ethical option since alternative treatment procedure exists for complex health conditions. Voluntary euthanasia is a mark on medical research as it undermines such research from all dimensions. The common notion might be that there exist only two options for patients who suffer terminal illness; dying in unrelieved condition or receiving euthanasia. However, there is a way in the middle of these two extreme case, and that is the delivery of compassionate and creative care. Meticulous research highlights that a patient with a terminal illness can be relieved to an extent so that he can live with the help of advanced techniques. In addition, autonomy is significant but not absolute (Emanuel et al., 2016). Opponents of euthanasia further dictate that the public conscience can be changed drastically if euthanasia is a common practice. Violation of the code of medical ethics is also violated in this (Fletcher , 2015). At the end of the discussion, it can be concluded that the right to die as a result of own decision making process is not justified. Though substantial arguments have come up in favour of euthanasia, the disagreements against it are more valuable. If the legislation supports euthanasia in future, there might be a deleterious impact on the lives of patients. The arguments emerging from literature have wider implications, and thus a further critical analysis is required before coming to a particular standpoint. References Boudreau, J. D. (2011). Physician-Assisted Suicide and Management: Can You Even Imagine Teaching Medical Students How to End Their Patients Lives?The Permanente Journal,15(4), 7984. Emanuel, E. J., Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B. D., Urwin, J. W., Cohen, J. (2016). Attitudes and practices of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in the United States, Canada, and Europe.Jama,316(1), 79-90. Fletcher, J. F. (2015).Morals and Medicine: the moral problems of the patient's right to know the truth, contraception, artificial insemination, sterilization, euthanasia. Princeton University Press. Math, S. B., Chaturvedi, S. K. (2012). Euthanasia: Right to life vs right to die.The Indian Journal of Medical Research,136(6), 899902. Murphy, B. J. (2016). Voluntary euthanasia laws in Australia: are we really better off dead?.The Medical Journal of Australia,205(6), 254-255. Sharp, S. (2017). Belief in miracles and attitudes towards voluntary euthanasia.Death studies,41(4), 211-219.